{"id":33,"date":"2014-11-05T16:53:33","date_gmt":"2014-11-05T16:53:33","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2015-03-26T09:07:58","modified_gmt":"2015-03-26T15:07:58","slug":"33","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/2014\/11\/05\/33\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Leaving a STEM Major an Independent Choice?"},"content":{"rendered":"<span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">This question has been running through my head since reading, \u201c<a title=\"Different People article\" href=\"http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/03075079.2013.801432#.VFqqNU2YZQs\" target=\"_blank\">\u2019Different People Have Different Prioirties\u2019: Work-family Balance, Gender, and the Discourse of Choice<\/a>\u201d by Beddoes and Pawley in <em><a title=\"Studies in Higher Education\" href=\"http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/toc\/cshe20\/current#.VFqp7E2YZQs\" target=\"_blank\">Studies in Higher Education<\/a>. <\/em><\/span><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">The article reports on an investigation of the continuing underrepresentation of women faculty in STEM fields. Both female and male faculty interviewees expressed that women have the freedom to choose whether to stay in academics or not. Yet, the women also described how the academic system and social norms are stacked against them if they want to have a partner and\/or children. The researchers observe: \u201cHere, then, we can see choice as an inadequate notion serving to mask or \u2018deproblematize\u2019 structural inequalities, thus relinquishing higher education administers [sic] from responsibility for change\u201d (p.1581). <\/span><\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\">I have seen a similar limitation of choice among undergraduates who leave STEM majors from the reading I\u2019ve done on the topic. Although structural inequalities for women and minorities who attempt to stick with STEM are well-documented, I want to focus today on inequalities that impact fiscally disadvantaged students. Many of the activities proven to support STEM persistence are only available to students who attend school full-time and live on-campus. Examples are doing volunteer work or unpaid internships in campus labs, participating in student study groups and organizations, interacting with faculty outside of class time, and residing in living-learning dorms. <\/span><\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\">At my university, many of the students take classes part-time and work part- or full-time to pay for their education. The vast majority of students commute from rental housing or their parents\u2019 homes to save money on living expenses. These students don\u2019t have the luxury of having coffee with a professor, or living and socializing with students who are also STEM majors, because they are trying to make ends meet. Yes, there is financial aid, but it frequently involves taking on crushing loan debt that may be difficult to pay off in the current economy. <\/span><\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\">So are working or commuting students who leave STEM for non-STEM majors simply making an independent choice to enter a field better-suited to them? I would argue the choice is not independent, but heavily influenced by their socio-economic status. Because they don\u2019t fit the expensive \u201cfull-time, on-campus\u201d student paradigm, they are cut off from academic and social support needed to succeed in STEM majors. I would encourage higher education administrators to seriously examine a system that appears to work against disadvantaged STEM students, no matter how intelligent or motivated they are.<\/span><\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\">Categories: Disadvantaged students<\/span><\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\">Tags: Studies in Higher Education; Kacey Beddoes; Alice L. Pawley<\/span><\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri;\">Photo attribution: \u201c<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/laceybordeaux\/5744311332\/\"><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri; color: #0000ff;\">Happiness Is a Choice<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri;\">,\u201d by Laura Grace Bordeaux, 2011. Licensed through <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/2.0\/\"><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri; color: #0000ff;\">Creative Commons<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri;\">.<\/span>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"This question has been running through my head since reading, \u201c\u2019Different People Have Different Prioirties\u2019: Work-family Balance, Gender, and the Discourse of Choice\u201d by Beddoes and Pawley in Studies in Higher Education. The article reports on an investigation of the continuing underrepresentation of women faculty in STEM fields. Both female and male faculty interviewees expressed&#8230;  <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/2014\/11\/05\/33\/\" class=\"more-link\" title=\"Read Is Leaving a STEM Major an Independent Choice?\">Read more &raquo;<\/a>","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":58,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[],"tags":[69],"class_list":["post-33","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-disadvantaged_students"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2015\/03\/Choice.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/s5tTwG-33","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":108,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33\/revisions\/108"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/58"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.unt.edu\/scienceretentionlibrarian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}